Union of Random Hyperbolic Graphs

This brief (and unfinished) post describes the basis of ongoing work regarding the properties of the union of RHGs, a type of graphs that can repsresent real social networks with high fidelity. The social network similarity is corroborated by the power-law degree distribution observed in RHGs. This distribution manifests within a specific parameter range of the model. In this regime, where the degree distribution conforms to a power law with an exponent between 2 and 3, the emergence of a giant component is guaranteed almost surely (a.a.s.). We want to explore various characteristics of the union of hyperbolic graphs, such as the size of the \(k\)-core, the number of connected components, and the diameter of the giant component.

We define such union in the following way. Let \(G=(V, E)\) be a random hyperbolic graph. Let edges \(e\in E(G)\) be labelled $uv$ for \(u<v\) and \(u, v\in V(G)\) connected. For a collection of \(k\) graphs with the same labelling and number of vertices, we define the union graph \(U\) as:

\[U(V, E)=\left(V, \bigcup_{i\in k}E(G_i) \right)\]

We have observed that the curves defined by the \(k\)-core size indicate that the sizes of \(k\)-cores increase following a sigmoid growth. Those cores with smaller $k$ value grow more rapidly than those with greater $k$. This is explained through the degree distribution of RHG, known to be a power law. For greater \(k\) values, the \(k\)-core is smaller since few vertices have large degrees, and to build such great negihborhoods by union is slow.




Enjoy Reading This Article?

Here are some more articles you might like to read next:

  • Gossiping in social networks
  • Gerrymandering